Last week in Critical Studies, Richard introduced us to the First Things First manifesto and then yesterday in our PPD session we looked at it again and were posed the question 'what is your price?'.
First Things First, in a nutshell, says that we as designers should not waste our talents doing commercial projects. Instead we should be working towards a far greater purpose. After speaking to several people in the class I think I am in the minority because I am completely against the things outlined in this manifesto. I believe that what the manifesto dreams up is idealistic, preachy and polemic. It suggests from a very naive Marxist standpoint that wage labour isolates us from our core selves and that we should seek out more 'rewarding' projects, a concept not too different to the pro-bono work that lawyers, doctors and cosmetic surgeons carry out.
The authors of the piece in both 1964 and 2000 seem to think of advertising as a debased or perverted form of design and this whole manifesto is just an implicit attack on the subject. Their elitist viewpoint is typical of people who have already earned some money and gained a reputation as a designer. Just because they have had some success, they think that they can do whatever they want and look down on us lot who are just starting out and do have to earn a living by 'flogging crap'.
My price is high but whatever company I work for will be able to afford it. If the BNP were to offer me money to design something for them, I would take it. We cannot afford to be picky. Just because you don't like something is not a good enough excuse not to take a job. For example I hate fish but I would still work my arse off to design something to help sell fish if they were going to give me the job. Michael Bierut wrote a very interesting essay on this manifesto and he wisely commented that "the greatest designers have always found ways to align the aims of their corporate clients with their own personal interests and, ultimately, with the public good'.
Designers and design students need to remember that this is a job. We spend 4 years studying design so that we can earn money, live comfortably and buy the things we want. If you had all the money in the world, why would you bother working at all? Surely you would go lay on a beach somewhere and enjoy your short time on this earth. Life is too short to worry about ethics. Some people might say that if all you want to do in life is earn money, why not do something far more profitable such as prostitution? Well frankly I don't want to sell my body, I want to sell my talents as a designer. Design is something that challenges my brain, keeps me engaged with the world and channels my creativity. If I wanted to be a prostitute I wouldn't be wasting valuable street time writing this blog!
We, the undersigned, are graphic designers, art directors and visual communicators who have been raised in a world in which the techniques and apparatus of advertising have persistently been presented to us as the most lucrative, effective and desirable use of our talents. Many design teachers and mentors promote this belief; the market rewards it; a tide of books and publications reinforces it.
Encouraged in this direction, designers then apply their skill and imagination to sell dog biscuits, designer coffee, diamonds, detergents, hair gel, cigarettes, credit cards, sneakers, butt toners, light beer and heavy-duty recreational vehicles. Commercial work has always paid the bills, but many graphic designers have now let it become, in large measure, what graphic designers do. This, in turn, is how the world perceives design. The profession's time and energy is used up manufacturing demand for things that are inessential at best.
Many of us have grown increasingly uncomfortable with this view of design. Designers who devote their efforts primarily to advertising, marketing and brand development are supporting, and implicitly endorsing, a mental environment so saturated with commercial messages that it is changing the very way citizen-consumers speak, think, feel, respond and interact. To some extent we are all helping draft a reductive and immeasurably harmful code of public discourse.
There are pursuits more worthy of our problem-solving skills. Unprecedented environmental, social and cultural crises demand our attention. Many cultural interventions, social marketing campaigns, books, magazines, exhibitions, educational tools, television programs, films, charitable causes and other information design projects urgently require our expertise and help.
We propose a reversal of priorities in favor of more useful, lasting and democratic forms of communication - a mindshift away from product marketing and toward the exploration and production of a new kind of meaning. The scope of debate is shrinking; it must expand. Consumerism is running uncontested; it must be challenged by other perspectives expressed, in part, through the visual languages and resources of design.
In 1964, 22 visual communicators signed the original call for our skills to be put to worthwhile use. With the explosive growth of global commercial culture, their message has only grown more urgent. Today, we renew their manifesto in expectation that no more decades will pass before it is taken to heart.
Signed:
Jonathan Barnbrook
Nick Bell
Andrew Blauvelt
Hans Bockting
Irma Boom
Sheila Levrant de Bretteville
Max Bruinsma
Siân Cook
Linda van Deursen
Chris Dixon
William Drenttel
Gert Dumbar
Simon Esterson
Vince Frost
Ken Garland
Milton Glaser
Jessica Helfand
Steven Heller
Andrew Howard
Tibor Kalman
Jeffery Keedy
Zuzana Licko
Ellen Lupton
Katherine McCoy
Armand Mevis
J. Abbott Miller
Rick Poynor
Lucienne Roberts
Erik Spiekermann
Jan van Toorn
Teal Triggs
Rudy VanderLans
Bob Wilkinson
----------------
Now playing:
Saves The Day - Anywhere With Youvia
FoxyTunesLabels: critical studies, first things first
0 comments
We, the undersigned, are graphic designers, photographers and students who have been brought up in a world in which the techniques and apparatus of advertising have persistently been presented to us as the most lucrative, effective and desirable means of using our talents. We have been bombarded with publications devoted to this belief, applauding the work of those who have flogged their skill and imagination to sell such things as: cat food, stomach powders, detergent, hair restorer, striped toothpaste, aftershave lotion, beforeshave lotion, slimming diets, fattening diets, deodorants, fizzy water, cigarettes, roll-ons, pull-ons and slip-ons.
By far the greatest effort of those working in the advertising industry are wasted on these trivial purposes, which contribute little or nothing to our national prosperity.
In common with an increasing numer of the general public, we have reached a saturation point at which the high pitched scream of consumer selling is no more than sheer noise. We think that there are other things more worth using our skill and experience on. There are signs for streets and buildings, books and periodicals, catalogues, instructional manuals, industrial photography, educational aids, films, television features, scientific and industrial publications and all the other media through which we promote our trade, our education, our culture and our greater awareness of the world.
We do not advocate the abolition of high pressure consumer advertising: this is not feasible. Nor do we want to take any of the fun out of life. But we are proposing a reversal of priorities in favour of the more useful and more lasting forms of communication. We hope that our society will tire of gimmick merchants, status salesmen and hidden persuaders, and that the prior call on our skills will be for worthwhile purposes. With this in mind we propose to share our experience and opinions, and to make them available to colleagues, students and others who may be interested.
Signed:
Edward Wright
Geoffrey White
William Slack
Caroline Rawlence
Ian McLaren
Sam Lambert
Ivor Kamlish
Gerald Jones
Bernard Higton
Brian Grimbly
John Garner
Ken Garland
Anthony Froshaug
Robin Fior
Germano Facetti
Ivan Dodd
Harriet Crowder
Anthony Clift
Gerry Cinamon
Robert Chapman
Ray Carpenter
Ken Briggs
----------------
Now playing:
Joy Division - Love Will Tear Us Apartvia
FoxyTunesLabels: critical studies, first things first
0 comments
So our latest brief was to come up with a poster suitable for entry into the
Don't Panic poster competition working to the title of 'Machine'. My first attempt was focused on reasons why you would panic if something went wrong with a machine. A frayed wire worked well as all machines rely on power. But the image wasn't that great.
Next I thought about what would happen if cogs couldn't quite meet. In the crit people seemed to like the colours and design of the piece but the message wasn't clear enough.
Then for my third and final attempt I decided to rework the concept of the 2nd piece into a more cohesive image. A broken typewriter where the letter 'n' doesn't work.
I'm happy with the piece now but still no votes as of yet, surprise surprise. I hate this competition and all that it stands for. You only get chosen if you're a great illustrator. Even the best typographic design ever created wouldn't get picked.
----------------
Now playing:
Beck - The New Pollutionvia
FoxyTunesLabels: don't panic, posters
0 comments
These are some beautiful prints done by Jason Munn who is the man behind
The Small Stakes website. The site also has tons of other posters for some great American indie bands. A truly great printmaker, in my opinion.
----------------
Now playing:
Smashing Pumpkins - The Aeroplane Flies High (Turns Left, Looks Right)via
FoxyTunesLabels: colour, jason munn, print
0 comments
Some more examples of different colour modes used in print:
This is a very nice Gocco duotone print by Magic Jelly. They have done lots of cutesy style prints which are available from
here.
These are the duotone black and red prints available from If You Could back in January. Each month they release 2 prints - one by an established designer and one by an up and coming.
More duotone action from the designer Chris Thompson. It was produced to showcase the viscom graduates from Glasgow School Of Art back in 2007.
THIS IS Studio are responsible for this greyscale poster on yellow stock. It is an offset litho print from an exhibition at Dazed and Confused. The show was to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Dr Duncan MacDougall’s claim that the human soul weighs 21 grams. The posters account the various reactions and triggers to 21 grams of forgotten matter from their studio floor: the inherent soul of the studio.
----------------
Now playing:
Vincent Vincent And The Villains - I'm Alivevia
FoxyTunesLabels: colour, print
0 comments